When different acharyas write books according to time-place-circumstances, how will Prabhupada books be lawbooks for ten thousand years?
How should we respond to classes that seem confusing and contradictory to the standard philosophical understanding
How should we counter when a respected ex-SC judge says that scripture contains poetic exaggerations?
When a mother stops a child from doing something harmful why does Krishna not stop the soul from wrongdoing?
Is the insignificance of the duration of evil from an eternal perspective the only explanation for evil?
If misery is caused by misidentification, then why is there not just mental pain but also physical pain?
When Krishna says that the knowledge in disciplic succession was lost, weren’t the four sampradayas available at that time?
If Arjuna was superior to Karna, why does Bhagavatam say he was a small fish in an ocean of giant fishes?
Was Prabhupada’s renunciation in the mode of passion as it was triggered by frustration with uncooperative family members?
When devotees are frustrated with the problems of grihastha life, should they think of the renounced ashramas as the solution?
Is the universal form in the Gita’s ninth chapter a conceptualization and the eleventh chapter, a revelation?
How is the world a lila of the Pursha avatara? Is it a virtual reality manufactured by him with chosable scripts for us?
When everything is in Prabhupada’s books, what is the need to read other books either by ISKCON devotees or previous acharyas?
To realize everything is illusion amidst adversities, is yoga and pranayama the way or is bhakti-yoga sufficient?
As developing internal conviction takes time, isn’t it better to be stimulated in our devotion by external inspiration?
When the number of breaths of a soul in a body are fixed, how can a purpose-driven attitude increase longevity?
Why does Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati criticize organized churches when ISKCON is also an organised church?
