How do we understand different devotees interpreting the moisture on the Pancha Tattva Deities differently?
Ishopanishad says God’s body has no veins, whereas SB says rivers are the veins of Virat rupa – how to reconcile?
When we get answers to doubts about which we pray, should we see those answers as Krishna’s reciprocation?
Can you give an example of unnecessarily provocative presentation of apara-vidya that we should avoid?
How can we give people initial faith so that they can practice para-vidya and experience its potency?
Is Krishna’s reference to Arjuna as Bharata spiritual because the Bharata dynasty is filled with liberated souls?
If Krishna addresses Arjuna as per the bodily conception, does it mean that Krishna is in the bodily conception?
If a senior devotee asks me to take up a major service that he himself is not good at, should I follow him?
Does the improbability of extra-terrestrial life support more the Christian conception of God than the Vedic conception?
As neophytes can’t understand tattva and rasa accurately, isn’t it better to consider Krishna-lila depictions as literal and not artistic?
Won’t atheists use the concept of artistic license in depciting Krishna-lila to say that his supernatural pastimes are poetic exaggerations?