How can we make right decisions when what is right is not clear and the decisions have serious consequences?
Why does the Gita say that sva-dharma shouldn’t be given up whereas Bhagavatam says sea-dharma should be given up for bhakti?
Are bhakti activities transcendental to the modes or are we to engage activities in the modes in bhakti?
During chanting should we try to control the mind or should we pray to Krishna that he control the mind?
Is the Gita’s statement that all endeavors are covered by faults applicable to a butcher’s profession?
How do we balance between respecting followers of all religions and acknowledging the violence that some of them do?
How can we share bhakti with atheists who are nature-conscious and are relatively in the mode of goodness?
If we feel worried the same way as we felt before practicing bhakti, is something wrong with our bhakti practice?
Are people around us benefited by our being Krishna conscious even when we can’t share our devotion with them?
Is sadachara as a sign of spiritual advancement relative – eg. some serious devotees find anger difficult to control?
Does Krishna’s call to Arjuna to rise beyond the three modes imply that we all can transcend our nature born from the modes?
If devotees repeatedly back out of services they have committed to, how to respond without becoming irritated?
In the Chatur Shloki Bhagavatam, Krishna refers to himself inclusively, not exclusively – what does this mean?