Is our affection for Krishna to be cultivated as between wife-husband or spontaneous as between child-parent?
Shouldn’t bhakti be a natural evolution in our love, not an imposition based on being told whom to love?
The Pandavas could have won a kingdom anywhere by defeating someone else – why did they win it by killing their own relatives?
During near-death experiences, is everything that happens predetermined or can the experiencer choose?
If we understand that we are souls, do we need to reject the whole life we have built on our bodily identity?
While understanding scripture according to time-place-circumstance, which factors need to be considered?
The ninth canto contains many stories of shocking debauchery by sages such as Brihaspati – what is their point?
When the Gita Mahatmaya talks about Gita recitation countering various sinful reactions, is that karma kanda or is it bhakti?
If it doesn’t work, get out – is such a utilitarian attitude in bhakti towards things like marriage justifiable?
When we face mental health issues, how can we deal with them spiritually and what can we learn from it?
If we are more attached to Krishna and less attached to family responsibilities, does that incur bad karma?
If we are following the principles to be initiated but have to wait for long in queue, does Krishna see us as initiated or uninitiated?
Why were the Pandavas treated so badly by their elders – in similar circumstances, are we meant to be submissive?
Won’t picking and choosing sections of philosophy or process rationalise rejecting important aspects of bhakti?
Should we make major life decisions based on bhakti considerations alone or also based on our material nature and situation?
When the Gita insists that we work according to our nature, why do ISKCON authorities tell us to do the needful, without considering our nature?
If the material and the spiritual are separate, how can chanting attentively lead to good book distribution?
Were the ancient sages humbler than the modern acharyas as only the latter mention their names in their compositions?
Who remembers Krishna – the mind or the soul, or the mind in the conditioned stage and the soul in the liberated state?
When the mind is external to the soul, what does externally serving and internally remembering Krishna mean?
When the Upanishads say the Absolute Truth is unchanging, how do bhakti teachers say that even Krishna’s abode is changing?
As intelligence can make us calculative or over-smart, how can we remain simple while being intelligent?
When intelligence can be used or misused, is intelligence a power of our consciousness or a gift from the Supersoul?