When the design argument is so logical, why don’t most people and most scientists accept God’s existence?
Is God improbable because he has to be more complex than his creation and complex things have very low probability of emerging?
Isn’t it better to be satisfied with the beauty of the garden without imagining a fairy at its bottom?
When devotee-scientists’ books are criticized by mainstream scientists can we quote them as scientific evidence for KC?
Does the Dashavatara conception – with aquatics in the start, semi-humans in the middle and humans in the end – support the theory of evolution?
Who has the proof or knowledge that incredibly well-designed natural crystals, the natural arches, or even complicated biological things were designed by someone ‘intelligent’?