If pure devotees know everything from all perspectives then why do they have differences as in different commentaries?
When we are 100% spiritual we see everything as spiritual. Then what is the difference between material and spiritual?
Won’t the parampara message get diluted because the present acharyas are not as powerful as the previous acharyas?
All the vedas and puranas are written by Vyasadeva, then why do they give contradictory accounts of the creation of the universe?
Isn’t our very existence a sin because we kill millions of micro-organisms with every breath? What can we do about it?
When a devotee suffers more than a nondevotee, won’t this send a wrong message to atheists or novice devotees?
Isnt it that all the miseries can ultimately be put as Adhi-daivika rather than differentiating them into separate categories.
If a person is not interested in spiritual world and is interested only in material enjoyment, what should be done?
Will recitation of Vishnu Sahasranama give the blessing of immoral pleasures without sinful reactions?
How do we learn from our sufferings in hell and in past lives when we neither remember those sufferings nor the causes of those sufferings?
What is the role of paramatma in atom, in contrast to paramatma in living entities who guides according to desires?
It’s said that phalena parichayate. we can know the quality of endeavors by the result. but then we say Krishna doesn’t care about results but our endeavors. Is this not contradictory?
Are the characteristics of the child determined by the soul’s own karma or the consciousness of the parents at the time of conception?
Can corruption be eliminated from human society completely or will it continue till the time of judgement?
Is putting faith in Krishna consciousness like leaping across a chasm with nothing more than the hope that we will make it to the other side?