Why is bhakti, especially as presented by our movement, seen by many as non-intellectual or even anti-intellectual?
As we can’t know for sure what are principles and what details, why not just follow the tradition as it is, without even attempting to change anything?
How the Bhagavatam is the means of conquest in material existence – Meditation on narayanam namaskrtya verse
Aren’t we trivializing initiation by equating the promises of initiation with the promises of hearing Krishna’s pastimes?
Bhagavatam tenth canto study 79 – 10.14.7-12 – Practicing devotion gratefully while accepting responsibility for our difficulties opens the door to liberation
Bhagavatam tenth canto study 70 – 10.12.37-44 – If ecstasy pulls us out of our service, we need to pull ourselves out of that ecstasy
Is remembering Krishna the highest service and all other services are for those who can’t remember him constantly?
Bhagavatam tenth canto study 43 – 10.8.7-12 Religious celebration is meant for spiritual purification, not social congregation
Gita 18.05 To be mana-isha, we need not just a mana free from ishvara-bhava, but a mana fixed on ishvara
Gita 17.27 Sat is not just a word for recitation – it is a conviction to cultivated and infused into action
From Love Universal to Bhakti Confidential – Gaudiya Vaishnavism Glories 7 – Love in separation is the culmination of love
From Love Universal to Bhakti Confidential – Gaudiya Vaishnavism Glories 6 – Parakiya-rasa is not immoral but trans-moral
From love universal to bhakti confidential – Gaudiya Vaishnavism glories 4 – Relishing the transformational legacy of God’s greatness and sweetness
When Prabhupada says that God can never be illusioned how can we understand that Krishna comes under Yoga-Maya?
Should we not read advanced krishna-lila because we aren’t mature or read it because we need to know our ultimate goal?
If someone follows a spiritual path without much knowledge of Krishna how will they advance spiritually?
